Local Heart, Global Soul

March 1, 2011

The Artistry of Capturing the Family Portrait…

Filed under: Art,Castles,The Netherlands — kiwidutch @ 1:00 am
Tags: , ,

(photograph © Kiwidutch)

People  have always liked to have images of family members.

In the last decade, digital camera’s have revolutionised both the ease and cost of capturing images of your family for posterity.

Camera’s have become affordable and easy to use.

Between the evolution of the camera and the internet, the Digital Age has made “photographers” and “journalists” of us all.

(…or so many of us would like to think LOL).

The wish to have and leave a tangible reminder of our human presence has always been with us, around the world we find representation of people in cave art and sculpted in stone.

Before the camera was invented, the medium of choice was the Painted Portrait.

Clearly you had to be a person of means in order to have one, but it was a specialised niche that kept artists employed for centuries long.

Ammersoyen Castle has it’s fair share of portraits…

…most of them pertain to it’s more recent past as far as counting the centuries go, and these items often spent time in other castles or safe havens in times of political, social or personal upheaval.

These paintings made me smile. Naturally members of the same family often bear a striking resemblance to each other, but I get two feelings from these paintings…

(photograph © Kiwidutch)

First.. this painter is more interested in painting finery than faces… rightly or wrongly I get the impression that it’s even possible that the dresses were painted first and the heads added later, the silver dress even appears to have been semi “recycled”  in two different portraits.

(Yes, apparently these are all different people!)

That said, the quality of the painting in the dresses is undisputed.

Secondly… I get the impression that the artist “did” pretty much only one sort of face.

Probably the sameness of the hair styles combined with family resemblances accentuates this, but  I giggled a bit as I saw them all since they were so similar.

These days important events in life are  swiftly documented, be it delight or disaster, anyone with a pocket point-and-shoot or even a mobile telephone can record an event often in the moments of highest drama.

Even if these portraits make me smile, I can appreciate that unlike today, the “masses”  of many time in history wouldn’t have a hope of making an image like this.

Portrait painting is today still very much a very niche market, and the Art of sitting for a family image like this is in danger of being an experience that even fewer of our generation, or those who follow will ever experience.

I think that’s a little sad, both for the sitters and the Artists.

(photograph © Kiwidutch)

(photograph © Kiwidutch)

(photograph © Kiwidutch)

12 Comments »

  1. I had to see what pink roses meant, because just about everything meant something back in the day, like a dog meaning “faithful” http://www.proflowers.com/flowerguide/rosemeanings/pinkrose-meanings.aspx

    It has many meanings apparently.

    My favorite is the woman in blue. The whole thing screams “I’m rich!” though. Even her little dog is a rich woman’s dog.

    Comment by Lisa — March 1, 2011 @ 6:20 am | Reply

    • Hi Lisa,
      I knew that flowers had meaning but it never occurred to me that flowers in portraits were placed with the intention of delivering a hidden message. I see from your link that depending on the shade of pink, that the pink rose could mean either: Love, Gratitude, Appreciation, Gentleness, Admiration or Sympathy.

      The Lady in Blue does scream wealth doesn’t she? The dog is even “accessorised” too with a matching decorative collar.(not much has changed with some dog owners of today LOL)
      I like the first photo …but for no other reason than I love the skill the artist has used in painting that amazing dress.
      Thanks for the link… I am delighted to have learned something new today!

      Comment by Kiwidutch — March 1, 2011 @ 7:17 am | Reply

  2. I was going to ask you if these were all the same person, but then I saw that they are not! Funny, because they all look the same to me. Maybe the painter used the desses as the models, and copied the face from another painting LOL

    Comment by thedailyclick — March 1, 2011 @ 11:56 am | Reply

    • I think he had only one “style” of painting and stuck to it! (OR, maybe the family all really DID look so alike???) Uncanny isn’t it?

      Comment by kiwidutch — March 3, 2011 @ 7:10 pm | Reply

  3. You almost think this painter (as it seems these were all done by the same artist) had a form of PhotoShop and he just cut and pasted in the same face over the detailed dress work he preferred.

    Comment by Scott Thomas Photography — March 1, 2011 @ 2:14 pm | Reply

    • Medieval Photoshop… ROFL , Oh YES!!! I can just imagine it, you tell the artist your favourite colour dress, you “sit” for the head and he slaps the two together in the studio. Slap, dash, done deal… nexxxxxt !

      Comment by kiwidutch — March 3, 2011 @ 7:13 pm | Reply

  4. Wow they all look the same, it looks like its just a change of wardrobe. Anyways I find it eerie when I find this kinds of painting hanging on the wall.

    Comment by rsmacaalay — March 2, 2011 @ 8:45 am | Reply

    • They are ok during the day time, but at night, in low light, if you were alone in here, it might be a bit creepy to have these “watching” you .

      Comment by kiwidutch — March 3, 2011 @ 7:16 pm | Reply

  5. That is one lazy painter! :-) I think it is good that these types of portraits went out of style…creepy doesn’t cover it…

    Comment by milkayphoto — March 3, 2011 @ 6:44 pm | Reply

    • The camera eventually put them out of business of course, (well, downsized the industry considerably) and if it hadn’t it would probably still be the “norm” and no doubt we’d think differently. But yes, they do have a certain gaze…

      Comment by kiwidutch — March 3, 2011 @ 7:19 pm | Reply

  6. Great portraits. I should say that they presenting only one Lady. Okay if I am wrong, so I am. I checked hairline and positions and so I came to this conclusion. Well, this not a thing to “quarrel”, but the art is very beautiful and skillful, let’s us admire it.

    Comment by sartenada — March 4, 2011 @ 11:44 am | Reply

    • No “quarrel” just a different point of view expressed well, so no problem at all, since the point of a blog is also to open discussion :)
      One of the reasons that lead me to suppose that these were different people was that in the corner of each ladies portrait are the symbols of her families “arms” or that of the family she married into. That’s quite a usual feature in Dutch portraiture and in all of these cases the little shields and symbols are different. If it were the same lady then the shields and symbols should in theory be the same…

      Comment by kiwidutch — March 4, 2011 @ 7:57 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 372 other followers

%d bloggers like this: